12/6/2023 0 Comments Eighth rest pngMusical note Half note Eighth note Rest Clef, Notes, angle, musical Notation, notes png 3000x3000px 64.24KB.Rest Eighth note Music Soupir, resting, angle, text, rectangle png 2000x4167px 68.57KB.Sixteenth note Musical note Quarter note Eighth note Rest, music notes, monochrome, musical Notation, silhouette png 3000x3000px 87.3KB.Bed frame Drawing Furniture Foot Rests, bed, watercolor Painting, angle, mattress png 1024x723px 217KB.Foot Rests, foot rest, furniture, foot Rests, ottoman png 644x526px 413.12KB.Euclidean Health, Health and rest, angle, text, orange png 596x596px 26.37KB.black, Rest Quarter note Soupir, s Quarter Rest, text, hand, computer Wallpaper png 2000x4167px 92.47KB.rest assured eggs, product kind, pollution free soil eggs, free range eggs png 800x800px 355.72KB.Both could be used simultaneously, with a manual link overriding automatic adjustment. I know that neither of these would resolve all conflicts, but I think they would come a lot closer. Though I don't have a tested algorithm handy to resolve this, I have two suggestions:ġ) Allow the user to manually link a rest to the following note, with a vertical offset.Ģ) Automatically detect the conflict, and raise or lower the rest (in the vertical direction of the next note in the voice) until the conflict is resolved. In the example I attach, voice 1 has a G on the treble clef and thus overlaps the rest in voice 2. While the current implementation is certainly an improvement, especially with respect to identifying rests vs voices, it does not resolve the problem to the extent of being able to automatically format a score legibly (which I realize is a more difficult problem). I just checked this with the latest build (4104?). I posted this to the linked bug item, but since that's marked as closed, I'm posting here too. Having been programming for about 45 years, I know very well that programmers value the suggestions of users who can formulate them and are willing to convey them, traits which are much less common than one might expect.Īlso, if I position the rest manually and then transpose - which I'm likely to do, because the original key is pretty high for my voice - then I'll probably need to remember to move the rest again. Reporting this doesn't mean I think it's bad, just that I think it can be improved. Is the aim to be just an aid, or to lay out the music as close to print quality as possible? My impression is that the aim is the latter, to be a high quality notation tool. The question is, how much of the job does MuseScore aim to do? In this case, it's producing not just a less than optimal notation, but an incorrect notation. But standard notation practice never allows a note and a rest to overlap like this. Yes, I can write the entire piece on staff paper, as I learned to do 40-some years ago. But that gives an idea of what is done in standard notation. The other copy I've seen is transposed down a third and this measure is placed in the bass clef, so there's no conflict. In the oldest score I've looked at (one that's out of copyright, though I forget from which site), the rest is aligned with the lower Bb, below the staff. Also, this pattern (triplet with a rest for the first beat) recurs throughout the piece (21 times in 29 measures by a quick count) and is always notated with the rest, so omitting the rest would be confusing for this reason too. It would be less clear that the two following notes are part of a triplet. Xavierjazz: making the rest invisible would be potentially confusing. Good to see it's already being addressed. The example given there is actually much more compelling than mine. Yes, I'm almost certain it's the same issue. Chen lung: Thanks for the link I had not found that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |